NOW IN PRIVATE BETA

The missing layer
between AI insight
and AI execution.

AI coding tools let your team ship in hours. But deciding what to build is still slow, fragmented, and manual. Intent Infrastructure replaces that translation gap with a continuous, structured pipeline โ€” from raw user signals to machine-parseable specifications your AI coder can act on directly.

THE PIPELINE

๐Ÿ“ก
SIGNALSSlack ยท PostHog ยท Jira
โšก
FRICTION ENGINEAI clustering & ranking
โ—ˆ
INTENT CONTRACTMachine-parseable spec
โœฆ
AI CODERCursor ยท Claude Code
โ—ป
VERIFICATIONDiff alignment check
โ—‘
MEMORYExperiment log
CONTINUOUS LOOP
SCROLL

THE PROBLEM

AI can build in hours.
Deciding what to build still takes weeks.

AI coding tools have fundamentally changed how fast software can be built. But the upstream process โ€” deciding what to build โ€” hasn't changed at all. As development speed increases, this asymmetry becomes more severe.

THE SPEED ASYMMETRY

DECIDING WHAT TO BUILD
Monitor 5+ tools
Synthesise insights manually
Write specs for humans
Brief engineers
Hope it was right2โ€“3 weeks
BUILDING THE FEATURE
AI generates code
Engineer reviews
Tests pass
Ship ithours
placeholder
The gap widens as AI accelerates
5+ tools
to monitor manually

Fragmented Signals

Customer insights are scattered across Slack, support systems, analytics platforms, and internal discussions. No single view of what users are actually experiencing.

~40%
of features miss the mark

Ambiguous Specifications

Traditional PRDs are written for human interpretation. They lack precise definitions of success, which means implementation and intent routinely diverge.

< 20%
of teams measure correctly

Broken Feedback Loops

Teams rarely measure whether shipped features actually resolved the underlying user problem. There is no structured connection between what was shipped and what changed.

HOW IT WORKS

Six layers.
One continuous pipeline.

Each layer feeds the next. The pipeline runs continuously โ€” not as a one-time process, but as the operating system for your product team.

01

Signal Ingestion

Integrates with Slack, PostHog, and Jira. All incoming data normalised into a unified format โ€” qualitative user complaints and quantitative funnel data analysed together.

SlackPostHogJira+more
02

Friction Signal Engine

PM: Reviews & approves friction signals

AI connects related qualitative and quantitative data to surface problems that are both frequently occurring and high-impact. Output: a ranked list of Friction Signals.

Multi-source clusteringSeverity scoringRevenue impact
03

Intent Contract Generation

ENGINEER: 2-min sanity check on constraints

When a PM approves a friction signal, the system automatically generates an Intent Contract โ€” a structured, machine-parseable specification designed to be consumed directly by AI coders.

Auto-generatedCodebase contextLinked metrics
04

AI Coder Implementation

The Intent Contract is passed to Cursor or Claude Code. The AI coder implements directly from the contract โ€” no interpretation needed. No briefing documents. No ambiguity.

CursorClaude CodeDirect consumption
05

Verification Layer

ENGINEER: Reviews alignment report before deploy

After implementation, the system reads the git diff and checks alignment with the Intent Contract. Scope, constraints, and checklist items verified automatically.

Git diff analysisScope checkConstraint check
06

Outcome Monitoring + Memory

Metrics auto-tracked via PostHog. Success detection is automatic. Every outcome โ€” pass or fail โ€” is recorded in the Memory Layer, preventing repeated mistakes and informing future contracts.

Auto-monitoringMemory logFailure prevention

THE CORE ARTIFACT

The Intent Contract.
Not a PRD. Not a ticket.
Infrastructure.

Every field is either auto-generated from data or auto-consumed by a downstream system. If a field exists only for a human to read, it belongs in a PRD โ€” not an Intent Contract.

โ—ˆGenerated automatically from real signal data โ€” not written by a PM
โœฆConsumed directly by Cursor or Claude Code โ€” not interpreted by an engineer
โ—ปLinked to live PostHog metrics โ€” no manual tracking setup
โ—‘Connected to memory layer โ€” failed approaches never repeated

THE NEW ROLES

PMAuthors specsโ†’Approves friction signals
EngineerInterprets requirementsโ†’Reviews constraints
AI CoderWaits for briefingโ†’Implements from contract
intent-contract-IC-2024-0847.json
v1.0 ยท APPROVED
{
"contract_id": "IC-2024-0847",
"generated_at": "2024-11-14T09:23:00Z",
"status": "approved",
"problem_statement": {
... // โ†’ AI Coder
},
"affected_segment": {
... // โ†’ AI Coder + Monitoring
},
"codebase_context": {
... // โ†’ AI Coder
},
"hypothesis": {
... // โ†’ PM + AI Coder
},
"constraints": {โ˜… ENGINEER REVIEWS
... // โ†’ Engineer (review)
},
"success_metrics": {
... // โ†’ Monitoring Layer
}
}
Click a field to expand ยท8 fields ยท all auto-generated
โ—‘ KEY DIFFERENTIATOR

The Memory Layer.
Individual layers can be copied.
A system that learns from every experiment cannot.

Every company gets its own private experiment log. Not a history of what was tried โ€” but a structured record of the hypothesis, what was shipped, which metrics moved, by how much, and why it succeeded or failed. Future contracts are generated with full awareness of past attempts.

โœ•
Failure prevention
A failed hypothesis is blocked from being regenerated without explicit override.
โ†‘
Iterative building
If a contract moved a metric halfway, the next iteration starts from that baseline.
โ—ˆ
Smarter ranking
Friction signals with a history of failed attempts are ranked and weighted differently.
โ—‘
Compound intelligence
The more you ship, the smarter the system gets. Moat grows with every experiment.
memory / experiment-log.json
47 experiments tracked
EXP-047โœ“ SUCCESS
hypothesis: "Simplifying billing form will reduce step 3 dropoff by 20%"
primary: +18%
guardrail: โœ“ stable
// next: Close enough โ€” marked success. Next: optimize payment confirmation screen.
EXP-031โœ• FAILED
hypothesis: "Adding progress indicator will reduce onboarding abandonment"
primary: -2%
guardrail: โœ“ stable
// next: Progress bar increased anxiety. Blocked. Next iteration must not show step count.
EXP-019โœ• FAILED
hypothesis: "Email verification upfront will improve activation"
primary: -11%
guardrail: โš  slight uptick
// next: Upfront friction too high. Never move verify before value delivery.

POSITIONING

Not a PM tool.
Infrastructure for AI-native teams.

NOT this
A PRD generator
PRDs are documents written for humans to read
A product management tool
PMs don't author โ€” they approve
A feedback aggregator
Productboard, Pendo already do this
An analytics platform
PostHog is the analytics layer
An AI coding tool
Cursor, Claude Code are the coders
A replacement for your stack
It connects what you already use
What it IS
The system of record for product intent
Every decision traceable to a signal
A coordination layer for AI-native teams
Connects humans and AI coders precisely
A contract generation engine
Machine-parseable specs, auto-generated from data
An outcome monitoring system
Auto-tracks success via live PostHog events
A compound learning system
Gets smarter with every experiment you run
Infrastructure โ€” not a workflow tool
Built for scale, not individual PM productivity

"Every field in an Intent Contract is either auto-generated from data sources or auto-consumed by a downstream system. If a field exists only for a human to read, it belongs in a PRD โ€” not in an Intent Contract."

CORE DESIGN PRINCIPLE

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

No one owns the full loop.
Until now.

Existing tools own individual slices. Intent Infrastructure is the only system that runs the complete pipeline from signal ingestion to memory.

CAPABILITY
Intent Infra
FULL LOOP
Productboard
FEEDBACK + ROADMAP
Pendo
ANALYTICS + FEEDBACK
Cycle.app
CLOSEST COMPETITOR
Cursor
AI CODER ONLY
Linear / Jira
ISSUE TRACKING
Signal ingestion
AI friction ranking
Intent Contract gen
Codebase context
AI coder integration
Diff verification
Outcome monitoring
Memory / experiment log
โ—ˆ
The moat:The memory layer combined with the full loop is the defensible position. Individual layers can be replicated. A system that learns from every failed experiment across an entire company's product history โ€” and uses that to generate better contracts โ€” cannot be easily copied.

BUILT FOR TEAMS ALREADY USING

โŒฅ
Cursor
Primary AI coder integration
โœฆ
Claude Code
AI coder integration
โ—‰
PostHog
Analytics & metric monitoring
โ—ˆ
Slack
Signal ingestion
โ—ป
Jira
Signal ingestion
โ—‘
GitHub
Codebase context & diffs

EARLY FEEDBACK

โ€œ

We can ship a feature in 4 hours with Cursor. But we still spend two weeks figuring out what to ship. That's the gap Intent Infrastructure closes.

Director of Product
Series B SaaS, 85 engineers
โ€œ

The Intent Contract is the missing spec format for AI coding tools. PRDs weren't designed for machines. This is.

VP Engineering
AI-native startup, 40 engineers
โ€œ

The memory layer is the thing that will make this irreplaceable. After 50 experiments, the system knows our product better than most of our team.

Head of Product
Growth-stage fintech
6layers
end-to-end pipeline
8fields
per Intent Contract
2min
engineer review time
0manual
metric tracking setup

PRIVATE BETA

Ship the right features.
Every time.

Intent Infrastructure is in private beta. We're onboarding teams that are actively using AI coding tools and want to close the loop from signal to outcome.

No spam. No sales pressure. Reviewed by founders.

โœ“Using Cursor or Claude Code
โœ“Dedicated PM + eng team
โœ“Multiple feedback channels